logo

Unit 8 Assessments and Assignments

Learning outcomes

By the end of this unit you should be able to:

  • distinguish between formative and summative assessment purposes and applications
  • design clear rubrics and marking schemes that align with learning outcomes
  • implement peer- and self-assessment techniques effectively
  • provide effective feedback using feed-forward principles
  • apply academic integrity policies and plagiarism prevention strategies
dice

Activity 1 Assessment Overview

Explore strategic approaches to assessment that support learning and measure achievement.

Assessment serves dual purposes in university education: supporting student learning through feedback and measuring achievement for grading. Effective assessment strategies balance these functions, using formative approaches to guide learning and summative methods to evaluate outcomes fairly and transparently.

This unit covers assessment design principles, rubric construction, peer and self-assessment implementation, feedback strategies, and academic integrity maintenance. You'll learn to create assessment systems that promote learning while ensuring fair evaluation.

8.1 Formative vs. Summative Assessment Purposes

Formative assessments (quizzes, draft submissions) offer ongoing feedback and guide learning, while summative assessments (final exams, graded projects) evaluate cumulative achievement. A balanced assessment strategy leverages formative checkpoints to scaffold success in summative tasks.

Assessment Purpose Classifier

Categorize assessment activities by their primary purpose:

FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT

For learning & feedback

SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT

For grading & certification

Assessment Activities to Classify
Weekly quiz with immediate feedback
Final examination (40% of grade)
Draft essay for peer review
Final portfolio submission
Exit ticket after lecture
Midterm project presentation
Practice problems with solutions
Graded lab reports
Assessment Balance Challenge

In a 12-week course, what's the optimal formative:summative assessment ratio?

8.2 Designing Rubrics & Marking Schemes

Clear rubrics define performance criteria and levels of achievement, enhancing consistency and transparency. A well-constructed rubric includes descriptors for quality indicators (e.g., "Logical structure," "Code accuracy") and aligns directly with learning outcomes.

Rubric Builder

Design a rubric for evaluating student research presentations:

Rubric Construction
Criteria Excellent (4) Good (3) Satisfactory (2) Needs Improvement (1)
Content Knowledge
Organization
Delivery
Rubric Quality Check

Complete the rubric to see quality assessment.

Rubric Best Practices
  • Use specific, observable descriptors
  • Ensure clear distinctions between levels
  • Align criteria with learning outcomes
  • Make expectations transparent
Rubric Application Challenge

A student's presentation shows good content but poor organization. Using your rubric, how would you score them?

8.3 Peer- and Self-Assessment Techniques

Engaging learners in evaluating their own or peers' work promotes metacognition and responsibility. Structured formats—checklists, guided reflection questions—help maintain objectivity and foster critical insight into disciplinary standards.

Peer Assessment Designer

Create a peer assessment activity for collaborative group projects:

Assessment Structure
Generated Assessment Form

Select all options to generate the peer assessment form.

Self-Assessment Reflection Prompts

Learning Process Reflection:

  • What was the most challenging aspect of this assignment?
  • Which strategies worked best for your learning?
  • How did your understanding change during the process?
  • What would you do differently next time?

Quality Self-Evaluation:

  • How well does your work meet the assignment criteria?
  • What are the strongest elements of your submission?
  • Where do you see room for improvement?
  • How confident are you in your final product?
Peer Assessment Challenge

Students complain that peer feedback is too lenient or biased. What's your best strategy?

8.4 Giving Effective Feedback

Effective feedback is timely, specific, and balanced: identify strengths ("Your algorithm explanation was precise") and areas for improvement ("Consider adding a visual example"). Incorporating "feed-forward" suggestions helps learners understand how to achieve higher standards in future work.

Feedback Composer

Practice writing effective feedback using established frameworks:

Student Work Sample

Student's Research Proposal Abstract:

"This research will study social media and learning. Students use Facebook and Twitter for school. Some studies show it helps, others say it hurts. I will survey 100 students about their social media use and grades. The survey will have 20 questions and take 10 minutes. This is important because technology is changing education."

Feedback Framework Selection
Your Feedback

Select a feedback framework to see the template.

Feedback Quality Indicators
  • Specific: References particular elements
  • Actionable: Suggests concrete next steps
  • Balanced: Acknowledges strengths and growth areas
  • Forward-looking: Guides future improvement
Feedback Timing Challenge

You have 50 assignments to grade and one week deadline. How do you prioritize feedback quality?

8.5 Academic Integrity & Plagiarism Prevention

Preventing misconduct involves educating learners on proper citation practices, designing authentic assessment tasks that resist rote copying, and utilising detection tools judiciously. Clear communication of integrity policies and honour codes reinforces ethical scholarship.

Integrity Strategy Designer

Develop a comprehensive approach to promoting academic integrity:

Prevention Strategies

Educational Approaches:

Assignment Design:

Detection & Response:

Your Integrity Plan

Prevention Score: 0/9

Select strategies to build your academic integrity plan.

Policy Communication

Key Message: "Academic integrity supports learning and maintains the value of your degree."

Positive Framing: Focus on ethical scholarship rather than just punishment.

Resources: Provide citation guides and writing center contacts.

Integrity Violation Scenario

You suspect a student has plagiarized but aren't completely certain. What's your first step?

Review

Test your understanding of assessment principles:

Unit 8 Knowledge Check

1. The primary purpose of formative assessment is to:




2. A well-designed rubric should include:




3. Peer assessment is most effective when:




4. Effective feedback should be:




5. The best approach to preventing plagiarism is: