By the end of this unit you should:
Read this introduction to understand more about informal fallacies.
Informal fallacies are caused by problems in the reasoning, that is the jump from the premises to the conclusion. Although there are many ways to categorize informal fallacies, in this course they are categorised into four broad groups, namely:
Each of these groups of informal fallacies are introduced in turn in this unit.
Read carefully and consider the following informal fallacies. To understand a fallacy, you need to think.
There will be no understanding without actually thinking. PowerPoint and YouTube are useful tools, but the most important resource is your brain!
Fallacies that aim to distract attention are known as red herring fallacies. Red herring is a very pungent, or smelly, fish that could be used to distract dogs from the scent of a trail. This is probably the original of the name of this fallacy. Red herring fallacies include straw man, genetic fallacy, bandwagon fallacy (ad populum), emotional appeal (rhetorical ploy), wishful thinking, ad hominem, tu quoque, appeal to authority, black or white fallacy (false dilemma, false dichotomy), special pleading, no true Scotsman, the fallacy fallacy, gambler`s fallacy.
Watch this excellent video introducing a number of informal fallacies with easy-to-follow examples.
Consider the following fallacies carefully.
Consider the following fallacies carefully.
Consider the following fallacies carefully.
Image credit: Dirk-Jan Hoek (CC-BY).
The twenty-four fallacies is the most popular set of fallacies that are taught in universities worldwide. There is a free downloadable colour poster and an interactive website that can help you. The texts are written for native speakers of English, so the vocabulary may be challenging at times. Just use a dictionary to look up the meanings of any unknown words.
Read the following fallacies extracted from the website above and try to classify them into categories. You can use the four categories presented in this unit or your own categories.
Use the following website to practise naming the fallacies.
Recall these fallacies from their Latin names.
Work alone or with a partner. Describe and provide examples for each fallacy.
身代わりの男 | |
滑りやすい坂 | |
自分勝手な主張 | |
ギャンブラーの誤信 | |
間違った二分法 | |
間違った因果 | |
人格攻撃 | |
誘導尋問 | |
多数正当 | |
論点先取り | |
権威に訴えかける論証 | |
自然だと訴えかける論証 | |
一部真 ≠ 全部真 | |
事例引用 | |
感情直訴 | |
無様な言い合い | |
立証責任 偽不証明 | |
純粋な訴え(本当の◯◯は〜) | |
類似性強調による間違い | |
間違いによる間違い | |
無知に訴える論証 | |
曖昧な概念 | |
根底引用による間違い | |
もう一つ(真ん中)の選択肢 |
The translations were created by students. If you have any better suggested translations, please contact your tutor.
Work alone or in pairs. Identify the fallacy in each of the following arguments.
Work alone. Create a narrated slideshow with three slides for ONE fallacy: slide 1 - name of fallacy, slide 2 - example of fallacy, slide 3 - explanation of fallacy. Submit the slideshow(s) through ELMS in two formats: slideshow (e.g. pptx, key) and video (In PowerPoint and Keynote, there is an export to video option). The best submissions will be uploaded to this website. Feel free to include (or omit) your name (and photo?) in the slideshow.
Practice for your final exam. You need to explain fallacies when given the name of a fallacy. You also need to identify fallacies in written or spoken texts. There is no need to submit anything for this unit. However, as there are 30 fallacies (8 formal and 22 informal), it will take some time to master them. Start now.
Make sure you can explain the following 28 concepts in simple English:
Running count: 97 of 108 logical concepts covered so far.